

Squarespace vs Webflow compared on CMS, SEO, speed, security, cost and editing. See where Squarespace wins, where Webflow does, and which fits you.
Transparency statement
We independently review and test every app in our app comparison articles. We don't earn any commissions on the link or the platforms. In full transparency, we are a Webflow partner, and that's because we independently tested all the CMS platforms throughout the years. In our opinion, Webflow is the best for B2B marketing teams from mid-market to enterprise organizations worldwide.
Key takeaways
- Best for: Squarespace suits portfolios, small businesses and simple online shops. Webflow suits B2B marketing sites that need structure, SEO control and room to grow.
- CMS: Squarespace has blog and page-based content. Webflow has custom collections, reference fields and dynamic templates.
- Design control: Squarespace is template-led and polished. Webflow gives full control over layout, components and interactions.
- SEO control: Squarespace covers the basics. Webflow adds template-level control over metadata, canonicals, schema, sitemap, robots.txt and CMS item indexing.
- Speed: Both are hosted on managed infrastructure. Webflow's clean output lets a good build reach very high Lighthouse scores. Squarespace results depend on template and media.
- Security: Both are hosted SaaS, so no plugins to patch and no server to run.
- Editing: Squarespace is the easiest for beginners. Webflow is just as simple for marketers when the build is modular, but takes more to set up.
- Integrations: Squarespace has extensions and code injection. Webflow has native and API routes to CRMs and marketing tools, plus custom code.
- Scalability: Squarespace hits limits on content modelling and multi-language growth. Webflow scales further but has its own limits on very large CMS setups and complex app logic.
- Pricing model: Squarespace sells four simple tiers. Webflow splits site plans, workspace seats and add-ons such as localization.
Side by side comparison
This comparison will help you understand the strengths of each platform and decide which is best for your specific needs.
| Criterion | Squarespace | Webflow |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Squarespace suits portfolios, small businesses and simple online shops. | Webflow suits B2B marketing sites that need structure, SEO control and room to grow. |
| CMS | Squarespace has blog and page-based content. | Webflow has custom collections, reference fields and dynamic templates. |
| Design control | Squarespace is template-led and polished. | Webflow gives full control over layout, components and interactions. |
| SEO control | Squarespace covers the basics. | Webflow adds template-level control over metadata, canonicals, schema, sitemap, robots.txt and CMS item indexing. |
| Speed | Both are hosted on managed infrastructure. Squarespace results depend on template and media. | Both are hosted on managed infrastructure. Webflow's clean output lets a good build reach very high Lighthouse scores. |
| Security | Both are hosted SaaS, so no plugins to patch and no server to run. | Both are hosted SaaS, so no plugins to patch and no server to run. |
| Editing | Squarespace is the easiest for beginners. | Webflow is just as simple for marketers when the build is modular, but takes more to set up. |
| Integrations | Squarespace has extensions and code injection. | Webflow has native and API routes to CRMs and marketing tools, plus custom code. |
| Scalability | Squarespace hits limits on content modelling and multi-language growth. | Webflow scales further but has its own limits on very large CMS setups and complex app logic. |
| Pricing model | Squarespace sells four simple tiers. | Webflow splits site plans, workspace seats and add-ons such as localization. |
Squarespace is the faster, cheaper start for a small site or a portfolio. Webflow is the better fit once your website has to drive pipeline for a B2B marketing team.
That is the short answer. The real question is not which builder is nicer to use. It is which one stops being the bottleneck when you add service lines, new markets and campaigns, and your team wants to publish without waiting for a developer.
A note on where we stand. Overflow is a Webflow Certified Partner and we build on Webflow only. We do not build Squarespace sites. So we have a bias, and we tell you where Squarespace wins and where Webflow is weaker.
Below you get a side-by-side overview, eight criteria (CMS, SEO, design, speed, security, editing, integrations, cost and scalability), and a recommendation per situation. We end with how to move from Squarespace to Webflow without losing the search visibility you already have.
Squarespace vs Webflow at a glance
- Best for: Squarespace suits portfolios, small businesses and simple online shops. Webflow suits B2B marketing sites that need structure, SEO control and room to grow.
- CMS: Squarespace has blog and page-based content. Webflow has custom collections, reference fields and dynamic templates.
- Design control: Squarespace is template-led and polished. Webflow gives full control over layout, components and interactions.
- SEO control: Squarespace covers the basics. Webflow adds template-level control over metadata, canonicals, schema, sitemap, robots.txt and CMS item indexing.
- Speed: Both are hosted on managed infrastructure. Webflow's clean output lets a good build reach very high Lighthouse scores. Squarespace results depend on template and media.
- Security: Both are hosted SaaS, so no plugins to patch and no server to run.
- Editing: Squarespace is the easiest for beginners. Webflow is just as simple for marketers when the build is modular, but takes more to set up.
- Integrations: Squarespace has extensions and code injection. Webflow has native and API routes to CRMs and marketing tools, plus custom code.
- Scalability: Squarespace hits limits on content modelling and multi-language growth. Webflow scales further but has its own limits on very large CMS setups and complex app logic.
- Pricing model: Squarespace sells four simple tiers. Webflow splits site plans, workspace seats and add-ons such as localization.
Verdict: pick Squarespace to get a simple site live fast. Pick Webflow when the site is a marketing system your team will build on for years.
Who wrote this: Overflow, a Webflow Certified Partner. Jort Steinebach is a Certified Webflow Developer with 5+ years on Webflow and 40+ Webflow sites. Niels Voshol leads SEO and AI search, with 40+ B2B projects.
What is the main difference between Squarespace and Webflow?
Squarespace is a template-led, all-in-one website builder. Webflow is a visual builder that outputs clean code and comes with a full CMS, so you design the structure of your site instead of filling in a template. Squarespace is faster to learn. Webflow takes longer to learn and gives you far more control.
Squarespace is known for polished templates and a simple setup. It bundles hosting, SSL and e-commerce in one place, and its own comparison page pitches it at small businesses and beginners. One catch, reported by PCMag: you can't switch templates after applying one.
Webflow brings design, development and content management into one platform. Its Webflow CMS lets a team model content, build templates once and publish many pages from them. The price is a steeper learning curve, which is why most B2B teams have it built by a specialist and then run it themselves.
CMS and content flexibility
This is where a brochure site and a marketing system split apart.
On Webflow, you define your own content types: case studies, services, industries, team members, integrations, locations. Webflow's pricing page lists the building blocks: CMS collections that share a template, a REST API to manage content programmatically, scheduled publishing, bulk publishing and RSS feeds. Our guides on CMS collections and the Webflow CMS show how we structure them.
Why it matters for B2B: when a case study links to a service, an industry and an author through reference fields, you update one item and every page that uses it stays right. Add a new service line and you add an item, not a page copied by hand.
Squarespace works around pages, blogs and collections of items. That is enough for a company blog and a handful of pages. Webflow's own comparison page says that with Squarespace you can't publish unique content types without code. That is Webflow's view of a competitor, so test it against your own content model.
Where Webflow's CMS is limited
Webflow caps CMS items per plan. PCMag notes that your tier decides how many CMS items you can create, and Forbes Advisor points out that Webflow limits CMS items while Squarespace has no storage limit. Check the current numbers on the pricing page before you plan. Very large catalogs, such as tens of thousands of records, need planning or a different architecture.
SEO and AI search control
Both platforms can rank. The difference is how much of the technical layer your team controls without a developer.
Webflow's pricing page lists these SEO controls: custom title tags and meta descriptions, image alt text, social preview settings, canonical URLs (global or page level), an auto-generated XML sitemap, robots.txt rules for search crawlers and AI bots, structured data, 301 redirects, and control over whether individual CMS items are indexed. We go deeper in our guides to Webflow SEO, schema markup, robots.txt and the sitemap.
Squarespace covers the basics well. Its comparison page describes editable SEO page titles and descriptions, hiding pages, social sharing images and AI tools that suggest copy and alt text. Redirects live in a URL Mappings panel where you type one rule per line, with 301 and 302 support. For schema, canonical control and template-level output, check what your plan and template allow. We could not confirm full schema control in Squarespace's own documentation, so test it against your needs.
Why template-level control matters: if every case study, service and industry page comes from a template, you set metadata rules, schema and internal linking logic once. That is what makes topic clusters and programmatic SEO workable. Neither platform ranks a site by itself. Rankings still depend on content, links and strategy, and we don't promise results. If SEO is the main driver, see our Webflow SEO services.
Design freedom and branding
Squarespace wins the first hour. Its templates are clean, and PCMag finds its free templates good enough for professional sites. Free Webflow templates are weaker, and the best Webflow templates are premium, priced from $29 to $129.
Webflow wins the long run. Templates are a starting point at best. The real value is a custom design system with reusable components and a class structure, so every new page matches your brand and ships faster. Edition makes a similar point: Squarespace's structured layouts keep things uniform but limit granular customization, and advanced edits often need injected code or a developer.
For a B2B team this decides how well your positioning shows up. If your homepage has to speak to three buyer types across three service lines, a fixed template becomes a constraint. In our Playbook 01 builds we design the system in Figma first, then build it in Webflow.
Speed and performance
Webflow hosts sites on infrastructure that routes each visitor to the nearest server, according to its pricing page. Its output is standard HTML, CSS and JavaScript, so a disciplined build can score very high on Lighthouse. Our page speed guide covers how.
One Overflow example: we moved Nedcargo from WordPress to Webflow in 4 weeks, with Lighthouse scores of 95 to 98+. That is one project, not a benchmark against Squarespace, and we have no side-by-side speed data of our own.
Squarespace gives every plan unlimited bandwidth and storage, per PCMag. Webflow plans have bandwidth limits, so check them if you expect heavy traffic. Some Webflow-leaning sources say Squarespace adds excess code. We found no neutral test to back that, so we won't claim it. Performance on either platform depends on the template, image weight and scripts you add. Test your own pages with Lighthouse and Core Web Vitals before deciding.
Security and maintenance
Both are hosted SaaS platforms. There is no server to manage and no plugin stack to patch, which is the main maintenance burden on a self-hosted CMS such as WordPress.
Squarespace states that all sites include hosting and security, with SSL certificates, web application firewalls and DDoS protection. Webflow includes free SSL on its sites, according to its comparison page. For certifications such as SOC 2, read each vendor's security page and ask for current reports. Your procurement team will want those, and they change over time.
For most marketing sites, security is not what separates these two. Third-party scripts, form handling and who has publishing rights matter more.
Editing: can marketing publish without developers?
Yes on both, in different ways.
Squarespace has a novice-friendly WYSIWYG editor, and PCMag praises its speed for general site creation. A new hire can make changes on day one.
On Webflow, marketers edit structured CMS items and modular sections, so they publish new pages and campaigns without touching layout. The catch: this depends on a good build. A site with loose styling and no structure is as fragile on Webflow as anywhere. When we hand over a Playbook 01 site, the handover includes live training, video tutorials and documentation, so the team owns the system.
Collaboration differs too. On Squarespace, LitExtension lists two contributors on the Basic plan and unlimited contributors from Core. On Webflow, seats and permissions sit in workspace plans, which Forbes Advisor notes can add up. If several people publish, price seats in from the start.
Integrations and extensibility
B2B sites live or die by what happens after the form submit. Webflow supports custom code, REST APIs and native or well-documented paths to the tools marketing teams use. We have guides for HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Mailchimp, Klaviyo and Airtable. See also Webflow integrations overall.
Squarespace offers third-party extensions, though PCMag notes some premium integrations are locked to higher tiers. Custom CSS and JavaScript start on its Core plan, per LitExtension. Check that your CRM, consent and analytics setup works before you commit.
Where Webflow struggles
Webflow is a marketing site platform, not an application platform. Complex app logic, gated customer portals and deep real-time personalization usually need external services or a custom stack. Webflow has been adding app hosting through Webflow Cloud, but for product-grade logic, plan the architecture carefully.
Cost: pricing and what you pay over 3 years
Prices change and differ by region, so treat these as a snapshot and check both pricing pages.
- Squarespace: four tiers. PCMag lists Basic at $19 per month billed annually, Core $29, Plus $49 and Advanced $99. There is no free tier, only a trial. Other reviews quote slightly different figures, which shows how quickly offers move.
- Webflow: a free tier, then paid site plans. Squarespace's own page says paid Webflow plans start at $15 per month. PCMag warns of extra fees, such as $0.50 per GB of extra space and extra bandwidth from $30 per month for 50GB. Seats, localization and Enterprise are priced separately; Enterprise is custom.
The licence is the small number. Over three years, the cost that matters is the one that does not show on a pricing page. Use this framework:
- Licence: plan, extra seats, add-ons, bandwidth, localization, for 36 months.
- Build: design, development and content migration. A template site you fill yourself is cheap. A custom system costs more up front.
- Maintenance: updates, QA, new templates, SEO work.
- Dev-queue cost: hours your team waits for changes, and campaigns that launch late. This is often the largest line and the one most teams never count.
We have no cost data comparing the two platforms, so we won't invent a total. Fill in the four lines with your own quotes and your own change volume.
Scalability: where each platform runs out of room
Squarespace
- Template lock-in: you can't switch templates once applied, so a rebrand often means rebuilding.
- Content modelling: limited relational content as service lines multiply.
- Multi-language and multi-brand: Flux Academy notes Squarespace has one navigation system and isn't the best fit for deep menus or multiple languages.
Webflow
- Very large CMS: item caps per plan mean big catalogs need planning.
- Complex logic: apps, portals and heavy personalization need other tools.
- Multilingual cost: Webflow Localization is a paid add-on, and its pricing page says more locales cost a separate fee.
- Enterprise: large organizations may need the Enterprise tier for governance and scale.
If you are building a product-grade experience, with logged-in users, complex data and many channels, a headless CMS and custom stack fits better. See Webflow vs Contentful. For a marketing site with multiple service lines and markets, Webflow usually has enough room.
Which should you choose? A recommendation per situation
Choose Squarespace if
- You are a solo professional or small business.
- The site is a portfolio or a simple brochure.
- You need a simple online shop.
- You have no marketing team and want to build it yourself this week.
- Speed to launch matters more than content structure.
Choose Webflow if
- You have a B2B marketing team that publishes often.
- You run multiple service lines, products or markets.
- You run a content and SEO programme built on templates and topic clusters.
- You need a custom design system that reflects your positioning.
- The site must connect to your CRM and marketing stack.
Look elsewhere if
- You need fast landing pages with minimal setup: compare Webflow vs Framer.
- You are fully committed to HubSpot as your system of record: see Webflow vs HubSpot.
- You are building an app or product-grade experience: a headless CMS fits, see Webflow vs Contentful.
- You are weighing self-hosted options: see Webflow vs WordPress.
- You are comparing other builders: see Webflow vs Wix.
Overflow builds on Webflow, so for B2B marketing teams our view is that Webflow is the best fit. If your situation sits in the Squarespace list, Squarespace is the right call and we would say so.
Moving from Squarespace to Webflow without losing SEO
A migration can protect your search visibility if it is planned. It can also damage it if it isn't. We don't promise rankings or fixed timelines, but this is the checklist we work from:
- URL map: list every live URL, with traffic, links and rankings, and decide where each one goes.
- 301 redirects: map old URLs to the closest new page. Squarespace sites keep their URLs in the platform's URL Mappings, so export your structure first. See 301 redirects in Webflow.
- Metadata: carry over titles, descriptions, canonicals and alt text.
- Schema: rebuild structured data in the new templates, see schema markup.
- Content parity: keep pages that rank. Improve them after launch, not during the move.
- Post-launch monitoring: check indexing, redirects, 404s and rankings in Search Console and your analytics.
For one example, we migrated Nedcargo from WordPress to Webflow in 4 weeks. Every project differs, so scope depends on your site's size and structure. Read more in our Webflow migration guide.
To be clear on scope: Overflow handles migrations to Webflow and Webflow builds. We don't build Squarespace sites.
FAQ
Is Webflow better than Squarespace?
For a B2B marketing site that needs structured content, SEO control and custom design, yes, in our view. For a small portfolio or simple site, Squarespace is easier and often cheaper.
Is Webflow more expensive than Squarespace?
Licences are in a similar range, with paid Webflow plans starting around $15 per month and Squarespace around $19, though add-ons, seats and bandwidth can raise Webflow's bill. The bigger cost difference is the build and the time your team spends waiting for changes.
Is Webflow good for SEO compared with Squarespace?
Webflow gives more template-level control over metadata, canonicals, schema, robots.txt and CMS item indexing. Squarespace covers the basics. Neither guarantees rankings.
Can I migrate from Squarespace to Webflow?
Yes. Map your URLs, set up 301 redirects, carry over metadata and content, rebuild schema and monitor after launch. Overflow handles the Webflow side.
Which is better for B2B?
Webflow, once the site has to support multiple service lines, content programmes and CRM integrations. See our Webflow agency page for how we work.
Next step: build your B2B site on Webflow
If your Squarespace site has become the bottleneck, the next step is a website built as a marketing system, not another template.
Playbook 01, our B2B Marketing Website, covers strategy, a Figma design system, Webflow development, content migration, QA and handover. The CMS is modular, so your marketing team publishes without developers, and handover includes live training, video tutorials and documentation. For context, Aumatics, a managed IT and cybersecurity firm, reports 300%+ marketing ROI and 8+ new high-ticket clients since working with us. Results vary by company.
Ready to build a B2B website that drives growth? Talk to our Webflow agency team.
Still Have Questions?
For a B2B marketing site that needs structured content, SEO control and custom design, yes, in our view. For a small portfolio or simple site, Squarespace is easier and often cheaper.
Licences are in a similar range, with paid Webflow plans starting around $15 per month and Squarespace around $19, though add-ons, seats and bandwidth can raise Webflow's bill. The bigger cost difference is the build and the time your team spends waiting for changes.
Webflow gives more template-level control over metadata, canonicals, schema, robots.txt and CMS item indexing. Squarespace covers the basics. Neither guarantees rankings.


